Sustainability or the Idea of Sustainability? The CRC Should Be Both.
The Oregonian's January 14, 2009 front page article discussed bridge design architect, Bradley Touchstone's new design for the Columbia River Crossing (CRC). The design has caught the eye of local leaders and architects because it incorporates vertical axis wind turbines that Touchstone says would "scream out to the world" that conservation is a priority for our community.
While I definitely like the idea of building a bridge that is both striking in its design, and that sends a message about our community's values with regard to sustainability, it is crucial that we don't confuse the mere idea of sustainability with actual sustainability. According to the Oregonian, Touchstone has no idea how much actual wind power from the turbines could be utilized. There is also the question of how the turbines would affect bicycle and pedestrian traffic.
While I think the design is both beautiful and could send a message about sustainability, the most important way to show the world our values is to ensure that the CRC has world class transit, light rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and is consistent with the policy of the State of Oregon to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as described in HB 3543.
Post authored by Kimberlee A. Stafford, attorney practicing in the Sustainability and Real Estate and Land Use Practice Groups.
